Disc Platinum Rule Assessment Free Essays

â€Å"The ultimate goal of the Platinum Rule is personal chemistry and productive relationships† (Alessandra). The University of Phoenix creates learning teams in each online classroom setting. Individuals bring different behavior styles when they come together in a group. We will write a custom essay sample on Disc Platinum Rule Assessment or any similar topic only for you Order Now The purpose of this paper is to discuss the different behavior styles as defined by the DISC Platinum Rule assessment and how it relates to learning team members. The DISC Platinum Rule breaks out into four dimensions of behavior. Each different dimension has strengths and weaknesses and no dimension is better than another. The four different dimensions are the dominance style, the interactive style, the steadiness style, and the cautious style. Dominance Style The dominance style has two main governing needs. These needs are the need to control and the need to achieve. People who fit into the dominance style are goal-orientated go-getters. They find themselves most comfortable when they are in charge of people and situations. People with the dominance style are fast-paced, task-oriented, and work quickly and impressively by themselves. They are annoyed by delays and challenge outdated thinking and ideas. Alessandra) The four sub styles of the dominance style are the director, the adventurer, the producer and the pioneer. The director questions authority, takes more risks, and is motivated by new opportunities. The adventurer, wary of people who may take advantage, is result-orientated and is motivated by dominance and independence. The producer chooses to be involved in chosen activities from start to finish. They resist people who are obstacles and are motivated by accomplishing bigger and better goals according to their internal timetable. The pioneer tends to focus on the future and is driven by a quest for unique accomplishments to avoid boredom. Holding a position to direct and redirect task accomplishments motivates them. (Alessandra) Tijuana Muse and Nessa Little, two members of the learning team, both fit into the dominance style behavior dimension. The snapshot of their sub style report marked them both as â€Å"The Producer. † The assessment described them as less guarded and less direct then most other dominance styles. The assessment also stated their primary goal is to achieve bigger and better goals. Weaknesses presented in the assessment include impatience and taking themselves to seriously. Strengths presented in the assessment include the ability to juggle tasks and a high energy level. Tijuana agrees with these results as they describe her work patterns and behavior. She needs goals to be set to help motivate her to achieve a higher level of performance. Even though she does not like timeframes, she prefers to work at a higher pace. Her behavior style effects the learning team by providing results quickly and timely if given a set goal. Nessa agreed with the results of her assessment. She will use the weaknesses presented as areas for improvement. She wants to broaden her point of view when it comes to goals. She becomes very focused on the task at hand and will forget that other things need her attention also. She needs to learn to be more flexible and show more confidence in other people. These observations from the assessment affect the team because she knows to ask others to share ideas and to will become more tolerant of the differences in others. Interactive Style The second style is the interactive style. People in this behavioral style are friendly and enthusiastic. They prefer to be in the middle of the action and thrive on admiration, acknowledgment, and compliments. People in the interactive style are more relationship-orientated and less task-orientated. Their main strengths are people skills and communication and they do so with enthusiasm, charm, persuasiveness, and warmth. Good communication skills help them influence people and bring them together to accomplish goals. (Alessandra) The sub styles of the interactive style are the socializer, the helper, the impresser, and the enthusiast. The socializer has a natural tendency to meet people. They speak freely about their thoughts feelings, and experiences, and receiving social approval from others motivates them. The helper has a natural dislike of pressuring others or telling them what to do. They seek close personal relationships that focus on caring and sharing and they are motivated by friendship. The impresser feels taking shortcuts to accomplish a goal is cheating. They become impatient with procrastinators and winning with flair motivates them. The enthusiast enjoys symbols of authority and prestige and is uncomfortable with confinement or restriction of freedom. Influencing others provides them motivation. (Alessandra) CooKie, a member of the learning team, fits into the interactive style behavior dimension. The snapshot of her sub style marked her as â€Å"The Impresser. † The assessment described her as seeing winning as an all-or-nothing proposition, judging people by their ability to make things happen, and working harder when there are bigger risks and rewards at stake. Weaknesses presented in the assessment included disorganized, careless, exaggerating, and poor follow through. Strengths presented in the assessment included persuasiveness, optimistic, motivating, and enthusiastic. CooKie agreed with how the assessment described her characteristics at work. She likes to go above and beyond expectations to complete a task. She often collaborates with co-workers in order to ensure the goals of the company are achieved efficiently. This causes her to be considerate of co-workers’ feelings when working on projects. As deadlines approach she tends to overreact that they will not be met. This is her reason to avoid procrastination. Her behavior style affects the learning team by providing a high attention to detail and being mindful of the other team members’ feelings. Steadiness Style The third style is the steadiness style. Individuals with this style are warm, supportive, and nurturing. They are excellent listeners, devoted friends, and loyal employees. This makes them the most people-orientated of the four styles. With a relaxed disposition they are approachable, which allows them to develop strong networks of people. People in the steadiness style do not like risk. They may tolerate bad situations rather than risk changing the status quo. They prefer to maintain their personal composure, stability, and balance. They exhibit behaviors of courtesy, friendliness, and a willingness to share responsibilities. People in this style are good planners, persistent workers, and good with follow-through. Because of their need of security, need to avoid risk, and desire to include others; Individuals with the steadiness style are slow decision-makers. (Alessandra) The four sub styles of the steadiness style are the relater, the specialist, the go-getter, and the harmonizer. The relater is threatened by changes that jeopardize relationships or surroundings, prefers to deal with concrete situations and data rather than theory, trends, or conjecture, and is motivated by personal stability. Specialists prefer to focus on their own interests. The excel in conditions that are stable and allow for steady, incremental gains and are motivated by doing what they know and only knowing what they do. The go-getter is a good short-term planner with an ability to identify roles, resources, and time lines. They are highly self-reliant and are motivated by a desire for a steady flow of more accomplishments. The harmonizer wants to be the person wanted and needed by others. They are motivated by the acceptance and approval gained from helping others. (Alessandra) Cautious Style The fourth behavior dimension is the cautious style. People in this style are analytical, persistent, and systematic. They enjoy problem solving and are detail-oriented. This causes them to be concerned with content over style. They enjoy working toward tangible results and perfecting the processes to achieve them. This type of person controls their emotions and tends to be uncomfortable amongst out-going people. Even though they tend to see the serious and complex side to situations, their intelligence and ability to see different points of view allows them to be quick and present a unique sense of humor. People in the cautious style can be over-critical because of having high expectations of themselves and others. In extreme cases their tendency toward perfection can cause paralysis by over-analysis. They do research, make comparisons, determine risks, and calculate margins of error before making decisions. This causes them to be slow and deliberate decision-makers. Some main strengths of the cautious style are an eye for detail and accuracy, dependable, independent, persistent, and organized. (Alessandra) The four sub styles of the cautious style are the thinker, the master-minder, the assessor, and the perfecter. The thinker has a preference for privacy, has a natural talent for deliberate decision-making and is motivated by the desire to be correct. The master-minder expresses his or herself more by what they do than by what they say. They choose to work alone and are motivated by increased opportunities for unique and significant personal accomplishments. The assessor is a quick thinker and can deal with many inputs simultaneously. They are motivated by accomplishing goals with excellence. The perfecter pays attention to key processes and details. They are methodical, thorough, dependable, and is motivated predictable results. (Alessandra) Anthony Cosenza, another member of the learning team, fits into the cautious style behavior dimension. His snapshot of sub style report marked him as â€Å"The Master-Minder. † His assessment described him as more guarded and less direct than most other cautious styles. The assessment also described his primary goal that motivates him is to increase opportunities for unique and significant personal accomplishments. His tendencies include being very alert to conflict and resistance, appearing focused and self-controlled with people, taking some calculated risks when making decisions, preferring to work alone, becoming overly analytical, and possibly procrastinating when under pressure. Weaknesses presented in the assessment include perfectionistic, critical and unresponsive. Strengths presented in the assessment include planning, dependability, problem solving, and systematizing. Anthony agreed with most of his assessment as it described many of his behaviors. During stressful times he does become withdrawn and focuses on tasks and the processes to complete them. He wants to be right and does depend heavily on data collection. He prefers to work alone and has good problem solving skills as the assessment identified. His behavior style affects the team by providing an awareness of the situation and being able to solve issues. Conclusion The DISC Platinum Rule assessment identifies a person’s behavior style. When working in a team each member will have a different style. Each style provides the team with unique characteristics that provide strengths and weaknesses. An effective team will utilize each team member’s strengths and look out for and correct weaknesses. By doing this a team will be highly effective in accomplishing goals and achieving success. How to cite Disc Platinum Rule Assessment, Papers Disc Platinum Rule Assessment Free Essays string(37) " new environment with assertiveness\." Question (1 of 18) I find it easy to share and discuss personal feelings with others. I prefer to keep personal feelings private, sharing them only when necessary. Answer- I prefer to keep personal feelings private, sharing them only when necessary. We will write a custom essay sample on Disc Platinum Rule Assessment or any similar topic only for you Order Now One of my main perspectives while working in a team / organization is to keep personal feelings controlled to achieve certain tasks successfully. To keep the personal feelings private is to behave more maturely and productively in a group. There are many kinds of personalities who have different ideas about each person based on their own personal reflection of a person. The person may be prudent thinker who can solve the problems with his shrewdness / there may be person who has the talent but lethargic to solve the problem / there may be a person who can make a complete mess when solving a problem / there may be persons who never wish to solve any problems. In this case if I am the organizer or the team leader, I should analyze the different sets of people in the work environment and abide by them rather than rendering my personal attitude towards a worker. Moreover any personal problems should be strictly prohibited in group discussions. We should always be in control of our emotions especially when other people estimate us to be very reserved. This does not mean that always personal feelings should be kept private; occasionally it can be delivered in a friendly, enthusiastic and jovial style to keep up a strong relationship with intimate persons. Question (2 of 18) I tend to be slower paced. I tend to be faster paced. Answer is I tend to be faster paced. In a work environment say it a business or a white color jobs, it is a tendency to complete the task in a faster pace than dragging it to incompletion. For example, being a graduate student it is always a recommended aspect of my responsibility to complete the assignments / projects in a faster pace than to haul it to the last moment for completion. According to my perspective, taking a quick decision is supposed to the best way to approach a problem and resolve it in a business setting. Along with the recent technological innovations in this automotive world, I believe it’s greatly possible for any worker to be quick paced to complete any task with ease. Question (3 of 18) I prefer getting tasks completed before socializing with others. I prefer to socialize with others before getting tasks started. Answer: Prefer getting tasks completed before socializing. This is one of the rules that I definitely follow in an environment where I have to take the responsibility to complete a task successfully. Whether working individually / group on a task / problem, I always remembered for what am for? For example; when working in a research lab I happen to come across many students, lab assistants, etc. where I have to spend most of my time. In such surroundings I should remember my responsibilities as a student to complete the research before getting into socially with the people in the lab. I can complete my lab work / research and then invite them for entertainment activities and social gatherings. It is always remembered to be a prompt person to be dutiful to complete the given tasks before getting into relationships and enjoy being social. Most of the times being very social may lead to several problems like misunderstandings; producing an incomplete work, etc Question (4 of 18) I find it easy to directly express my opinions. I am reluctant to directly express my opinions. Answer: I find it easy to directly express my opinions. According to my views on relationships with any person should be direct and expressive. For example while working in a project / exhibit for my college, I take up my right as a responsibility to discuss my opinions directly without any hesitations. Sometimes dumb persons express their thoughts very easily. So, I believe to express any of my opinions easily with my instructor who does not teach properly / or guide who fails to make me understand concepts, etc. To maintain a healthy team work it’s always an essential point to easily discuss one’s opinions with others. at times even a silly opinion tend to produce fruitful results. Question (5 of 18) I prefer building relationships over completing tasks. I prefer completing tasks over building relationships. Answer: I prefer completing task over building relationship. I always prefer this for the reason that I cannot trust any relationship except me to complete a given task successfully. I am a graduate student pursuing PhD studies in a college or research institute. I will be working under a guide who will be a person or group of persons who help me throughout my research and studies. In that environment I have to understand to be a proficient student to study and complete my project successfully than getting to know more my guide or team worker. Sometimes it’s tough to keep up our trends in avoiding personal discussions but we fail often and tend to be inquisitive to pry for others personal things especially married life, etc. Question (6 of 18) I usually react slowly when faced with new situations or decisions. I usually react quickly when faced with new situations or decisions. Answer: I usually react quickly when faced with new situations. Yes, this again is my perspective of completing a new task quickly. I know hasty decisions lead to disaster but keeping the decision prolonging for longer time will render the work imperfect. If I happen to come across a new situation say for example I am transferred to a new lab for my research studies by my guide, I have to take up the new situations and react quickly by getting accustomed with the new lab. Always there should be motive of deciding and implementing any tasks in new environment with assertiveness. You read "Disc Platinum Rule Assessment" in category "Papers" Question (7 of 18) I tend to get stressed when dealing with people on a daily basis. I tend to get motivated when dealing with people on a daily basis. Answer: I tend to get motivated when dealing with people on a daily basis. This is factual for the reason that working with people in the same environment daily will motivate me to be a self-confident person to know my responsibilities and work well. In our day to day life we may happen to meet many personalities who serve as motivational factors to boost our career. For example, no matter if a person humiliates or encourages for any work done, both humiliation and encouragement makes the person feel motivated. Any discouragement can sometimes render a challengeable factor for the person to excel in future; similarly even encouragement will boost the person to carry on the tasks fruitfully. Question (8 of 18) I make decisions whether or not all the facts are available. I make decisions after all the facts are available. Answer: I make decisions after all the facts are available. Yes this is with respect to my decision making ability when faced with a problem. It is true that without having any valid reasons in your hand you cannot object an issue or prolong a issue too. For example: Before I could start my career as a research analyst or scientist, I have to be cognizant enough to learn the scope of research analysts, whether it will suit my schedules, family, etc. Therefore only after learning the truths about the situation from various persons or books I can decide for my career as research analyst or scientist. Question (9 of 18) I prefer to work with other people or in groups. I prefer to work alone. Answer: I prefer to work alone. This is for the reason that not many times team work produces good results. There are many drawbacks to work in a team namely abide with others opinions which may prove wrong for my interpretations, time schedule and above all a speck of misunderstanding is more than enough to spoil the entire issue. For example, when given group assignments it often gets delayed because certain members in the group who wok lethargic and least bothered for a good grade. Whereas the group will be blamed as a whole if something goes wrong even though I may be perfect. When I work as an individual I will be more careful to complete the task successfully and even if something goes wrong I will get the chance to learn things to produce fruitful outcomes in future. Question (10 of 18) I tend to listen more than talk. I tend to talk more than listen. Answer: I tend to listen more than talk. This is my policy as a student because I am in the process of learning and not teaching. Therfore, I tend to listen more than to talk my own because I don’t want to stammer in between when I get messed up with certain things. For example when I have to discuss my doubts, I can do so without hesitations whereas when I have to listen to a new concept I have to be patient enough to learn and then talk to prove myself well acquainted with the topic in hand. It will not only make me confident but also encourage me to learn, think and then apply to produce a meaningful speech. Question (11 of 18) I am mostly time disciplined. I usually am not time disciplined. Answer: I am mostly time discipline. With my routine life I have formulated my own time schedule to carry out things. I know what to do at the right time. For example, working for long hours in the night and having less sleep will eventually reflect on the other day. I may tend to get tired easily and lose my track with the daily schedules. Therefore, I prefer to abide with my time schedule in working out things in my routine life. Question (12 of 18) I come across as more assertive than others. I come across as less assertive than others. Answer: I come across as more assertive than others. This is again for the reason that â€Å"I believe in what I am – confident† and I know that I am capable to do things successfully than others. This does not lead to the misconception that I am the only best of all, but a call within myself that I am better in what I do with my uniqueness and attribute in approaching a problem. I also believe that each person has their own style of resolving things. When I know that I am assertive than others I will get self – motivated and carry out tasks systematically and carefully. Question (13 of 18) I am easy to approach in new social situations. I am more standoffish in new social situations. Answer: I am easy to approach in new social situations. I am easy to approach in any social situations and don’t hesitate to render my help for any cause. After all it’s certain social situations that teach me to learn new things and get accustomed to new social issues. I know my responsibilities in the environment and open-minded in many social situations. Even in social gatherings or big events, I don’t make a fuss of myself to get approached because I like being social and treated socially. As an easily approachable person I am an excellent listeners, devoted friend, and loyal employees with my nature of being social. My relaxed disposition always makes me easily approachable and warm to develop strong networks of people who are willing to be mutually supportive and reliable. I like being an excellent team players. Question (14 of 18) I tend to `bite my tongue` when I don’t agree with someone. I tend to `speak my mind` when I don’t agree with someone. Answer: I tend to `speak my mind` when I don’t agree with someone. This is for the reason that I know what is right and what is wrong, because I know to differentiate things with my knowledge and experiences. Certainly I should have learnt the advantages and disadvantages, merits and demerits of an issue before handling it. Therefore I will have a clear understanding of the issue before getting into any decisions with someone. I don’t like to follow others decisions and always stick to my own perception of things because thoughts and perceptions varies from one person to another. What one person feels right about an issue will make me feel wrong and the reverse too. So, I prefer taking decisions only after cognitive thinking to bring out my best decision in solving the issue. Question (15 of 18) It takes time to get to know me. I am easy to get to know. Answer: I am easy to get to know. Every man is a social animal. I am very gregarious to be known by others as I don’t want to be very reserved with my own world. I also know that only when I am easily approachable, people will get to know about me and don’t hesitate to invite me for any discussions or team works. I like being social and hardly restrict myself being confined with my own perception. I know life will get easier and happier only when we learn how to be social. Question (16 of 18) I get impatient when things move too slowly. I get frustrated when things move too quickly. Answer: I get impatient when things move too slowly. I follow a quick rule to see things happen as early as possible because I get frustrated when things move very slowly without any real seriousness. For example, while working in a laboratory I did like to do the things fast and complete the records soon rather than sit and wait for things to be done. In case a chemical has not yet reached the lab and I have to do the experiment, I can’t sit up for long hours and wait for the chemical to arrive rather I will find an alternative chemical that has the same properties of the unavailable chemical and start working my experiments. Even when the results may change, I can feel satisfied that I have done something rather than just sitting idle whiling away my time. Sometimes my luck can take me to find something new with the alternative chemical used in the experiment. Question (17 of 18) I value feelings over facts. I value facts over feelings. Answer: I value facts over feelings. I can differentiate between feelings and facts and therefore I believe to value facts more than feelings. Feelings are mere thoughts that keep our minds vacillating to take any decisions, in such case it is good to analyze the task and implement our factual reasoning skills to control our feelings. Question (18 of 18) I generally avoid conflict. I do not avoid conflict. Answer: I generally avoid conflict. I always believe that the more the situation gets complicated the more sufferings I may undergo. Therefore, I generally avoid conflicts in any situation. Take the laboratory example where the chemical was unavailable in the lab, I know what I should do. Alternatively complaining the manager for the chemical availability by raising conflicts will make nothing to the unavailable chemical but eventually end in misunderstandings. Henceforth, it will become difficult to approach the chemical manager in future. It is easy to get into conflicts but hard to retain your assertiveness as a good person capable of managing any tasks with the easy going nature. Why you agree or disagree with this assessment? I agree with this assessment because it has made me understand my behavioral preferences in a work environment analyzing myself as a Director, Socialized person, Relater and as a Thinker. In my own way I have learnt that I am analytical, persistent and systematic who enjoys problem-solving. I am very much detail-oriented and consider such feedbacks with my full consciousness than style. I am very much task-oriented and wish to work with people enjoying and perfecting processes and working toward tangible results. How to cite Disc Platinum Rule Assessment, Papers